Skip to main content
Refutations

Safiyya bint Huyayy — The Distorted Word, the Biblical Double Standard, and Her Own Testimony

6 min read 1326 words

Christians claim that the Prophet ﷺ killed Safiyya’s husband with his own hand, took her captive, and violated her while she was in her waiting period. Each of these three claims is either a deliberate distortion of the Arabic text, a misapplication of Jewish law, or a contradiction of the Christians’ own scripture.

First — The Distorted Word: Quttila vs Qatala

The Prophet ﷺ Personally Killed Safiyya’s Husband Christians present the story as though the Prophet ﷺ killed Kinanah ibn al-Rabi’ with his own hand, then immediately seized his widow.
This is a deliberate distortion of the Arabic text. The original word in the books of biography is quttila — with a damma on the qaf, the passive form: “her husband was killed.” Christians changed the vowelling to qatala — with a fatha, the active form: “he killed her husband.” The difference between the two readings is enormous, and the distortion was necessary in order to deceive those who do not read Arabic.

What is established in the books of biography is that the Prophet ﷺ made a peace agreement with the people of Khaybar: they would leave and take whatever their camels could carry, while all gold, silver, and weapons remained. He stipulated that they must not conceal or hide anything — if they did, the covenant would be void. When it was proven that Kinanah ibn al-Rabi’ broke the covenant by concealing hidden treasure, the treaty was absolved and his killing was the consequence of his own betrayal and breach of covenant — not an act of the Prophet ﷺ personally.

Second — The Law of Captives Is in the Bible, Not Islam

Islam Invented the Taking of Captive Women Christians object to the institution of captive women and the right hand’s possession as though it is an Islamic innovation.
The law of captives and the right hand’s possession was not invented by Islam. It was present in the scriptures that preceded Islam — and Christians object to it in the Quran while their own Bible commands it.
Deuteronomy 20:14 (ESV) “But the women, the little ones, the livestock, and all that is in the city, all its spoil, you shall take as plunder for yourself. And you may use the spoil of your enemies which the Lord your God has given you.”
2 Samuel 5:13 (ESV) “And David also took concubines and wives from Jerusalem after he came from Hebron, and sons and daughters were born to David.”

Deuteronomy 20 and 2 Samuel 5 — Biblical texts commanding the taking of women as plunder and concubines
Deuteronomy 20 and 2 Samuel 5 — Biblical texts commanding the taking of women as plunder and concubines

Furthermore, if the ruling of the Bible were applied to Safiyya (RA) — as a married woman among the conquered — she would have been killed, not taken captive. Numbers 31:17 states:

Numbers 31:17 (ESV) “Every woman who has known man by lying with a male, kill her. But all the young girls who have not known man by lying with a male, keep alive for yourselves.”

Numbers 31:17 — the Biblical command to kill married women among captives
Numbers 31:17 — the Biblical command to kill married women among captives

Islam spared Safiyya’s life. The Bible commands her execution. The Christians object to her marriage rather than to the command that would have had her killed.

Islam did not only refrain from killing her — it went further and introduced the legislation of emancipation, correspondence, and the freeing of slaves, none of which existed in any previous legal tradition.

Third — Jews Have No Waiting Period; They Have Mourning

The Prophet ﷺ Married Safiyya Before Her Waiting Period Had Ended Christians claim the Prophet ﷺ violated the waiting period (‘idda) before marrying Safiyya.
Jews do not observe an ‘idda. The Jewish practice upon a husband’s death is mourning — seven days, not months. This is documented in the Christians’ own Bible:
2 Samuel 11:26–27 (ESV) “When the wife of Uriah heard that Uriah her husband was dead, she lamented over her husband. And when the mourning was over, David sent and brought her to his house, and she became his wife and bore him a son.”

Father Tadros Yacoub Malaty states in his commentary: “Bathsheba — with whom the Prophet David committed adultery — heard about the death of her husband — whom the Prophet David caused to be killed — so she mourned for him for seven days according to the ancient custom, then the Prophet David took her as his wife.”

The word used is mourning, not waiting period. Safiyya (RA) observed her mourning before her conversion to Islam and her marriage to the Prophet ﷺ, as was the Jewish custom.

As for the Islamic ‘idda, it was observed in full. Sahih Muslim (1365), on the authority of Anas (RA), records: “Then he gave her — meaning Safiyya — to Umm Sulaym to make her ready for him and to observe her waiting period in her house.”

Imam al-Nawawi (may God have mercy on him) explains: “As for his saying ‘obtain her waiting period,’ its meaning is: to purify herself; for she was a captive who had to be purified and placed in the house of Umm Sulaym during the period of purification. When the waiting period was over, Umm Sulaym prepared her and made her ready, meaning: she adorned and beautified her according to the custom of a bride.”

The ‘idda was observed. The Prophet ﷺ waited. The claim collapses.

— History of the Jews in the Arab Countries, p. 172 “As for Safiyya bint Huyayy ibn Akhtab, she remained loyal and faithful to her new husband and remained with him as a faithful wife until he passed away to be with his Lord. In this action, the Prophet followed in the footsteps of the great conquerors, as they used to marry the daughters of the great men of the kingdoms they conquered to ease their suffering and preserve their dignity.”

Israel Wolfenson — History of the Jews in the Arab Countries page 172 — affirming Safiyya's loyalty and faithfulness
Israel Wolfenson — History of the Jews in the Arab Countries page 172 — affirming Safiyya's loyalty and faithfulness

This testimony comes from a Jewish historian — not a Muslim apologist.

Fourth — Let Safiyya Speak for Herself

Sahih Ibn Hibban 4628 “The Messenger of Allah ﷺ chose Safiyya bint Huyayy and took her for himself, and gave her the choice between him freeing her and her being his wife, or joining her family. And she chose him to free her and to be his wife.”

Grade: Sahih · Ibn Hibban

The Prophet ﷺ gave her the choice. She was the one who chose him over emancipation and freedom. Any person given a choice between two options will choose the better one. Safiyya chose the Prophet ﷺ.

In a narration from Safiyya (RA) herself, recorded in Majma’ al-Zawa’id, Vol. 9, p. 15:

“I have never seen anyone with better character than the Messenger of Allah ﷺ.”

These are her own words. She chose him. She praised him. She mourned him. The Christians claim to sympathise with her — she is innocent of their sympathy, by Allah.

Finally — A Prophecy in the Psalms

Psalm 45:9 (ESV) “Daughters of kings are among your ladies of honour; at your right hand stands the queen in gold of Ophir.”

This prophecy — recorded approximately 3000 years ago — describes a king whose women include daughters of kings. Safiyya (RA) was the daughter of the master of Banu Nadir, from the lineage of the Prophets of Israel. The question is worth asking: in whom has this prophecy been fulfilled, if not in the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ?

Four doubts — four refutations. The word was distorted from passive to active to manufacture a murder. The law of captives comes from Deuteronomy, not the Quran, and the Bible commands killing married captives while Islam spared Safiyya’s life. Jews mourn for seven days, not months — the Christians confused Jewish mourning with Islamic ‘idda, which was in any case observed in full. And Safiyya (RA) herself, in her own authenticated words, chose the Prophet ﷺ over freedom and called him the best in character of all she had ever seen.
2025 https://www.openislam.wiki/og/safiyya-bint-huyayy-the-distorted-word-the-biblical-double-standard-and-her-own-testimony.png