Stoning Maiz and Asking the Messenger to Say a Bad Word
They claim that the goat asked the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, with an indecent word.
The response to: The Messenger of God uttered offensive words - may God bless him and grant him peace. Al - Hasan bin Ali told us. Abdul Razzaq told us on the authority ofIbn Jurayj. He said: Abu al-Zubayr told me that Abdul Rahman bin al-Samit, the cousin ofAbu Hurayrah, told him that he heard Abu Hurayrah say: Al-Aslami came to the Prophet ofGod,blesshimand grant him, and testified against himself that he had had intercourse with a woman unlawfully four times. Each timethe Prophet, mayGodhimand granthim, ignored himhe came forward on the fifth time and said:? He said: Yes. He said:Until that disappeared from you in that from her?He said: Yes. He said: Just as the kohl stick disappears in the kohl container and the bribe disappears in the well. He said: Yes. He said: Do you know what adultery is? He said: Yes, I came to her unlawfully, as a man comes to his wife lawfully. He said: What do you mean by this statement? He said: I want you to purify me. So he ordered that he be stoned. The Prophet, mayGod,. Two of his companions said to one of them, “Look at this man whomAllahhimuntil he was stoned like a dog.”
He remained silent about them. Then he walked for a while until he passed by the carcass of a donkey, carrying its leg. He said, “Where are so-and-so and so-and-so?” They said, “We are them, O Messenger ofAllahHe said, “Go down and eat from the carcass of this donkey.” They said, “O Prophetof Allah,who will eat from this?” He said, “What you have done to your brother’s honor just now is worse than eating from it. By the One in Whose Hand is my soul, he is now in the rivers of Paradise, soaking in them.”
They claim that the goat asked the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, with an indecent word.
Sunan Abi Dawood .. Book of Punishments .. Chapter on Stoning Ma’iz bin Malik
They claim that the goat asked the Messenger of God, may God bless him and grant him peace, with an indecent word.
Ibn Taymiyyah said in Minhaaj As-Sunnah : The scholars said: It is permissible to mention the name of the private parts explicitly for need and in the interest of the heart… as in the hadith of Ubayy ibn Ka’b on the authority of the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace, who said: Whoever offers condolences in the manner of the Age of Ignorance, then bite him with them, like his father, and do not use euphemisms… Narrated by Ahmad and authenticated by Al-Arna’ut and Al-Albani.
And similar to that is what Abu Bakr, may God be pleased with him, said to Urwah ibn Masoud on the day of Al-Hudaybiyyah: “Suck the clitoris of Al-Lat.” And similarly what the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace , said to Ma’iz ibn Malik, and what Hamza, may God be pleased with him, said to Saba’: “O son of the one who cuts the clitoris.” So the situation required that and the interest demanded it… because what happened to Ma’iz ibn Malik depended on his entire life.
The Messenger was not satisfied with the confession of the one who confessed to adultery, but rather he asked him in a word that was not more explicit in what was required, which was the word “fuck,” which the Messenger of God, may God bless him and his family and grant them peace, avoided speaking in all his situations and was only heard from him in this situation
Then he was not satisfied with that, but rather he described it in a tangible way, and there is no doubt that describing something with a tangible matter is more eloquent in asking for clarification than calling it by its most explicit and most indicative names.
Because the need here calls for clarity so that the matter becomes clear, and because the boundaries are guarded by doubts.
The word ” I fucked her ” is explicit and not euphemistic.
In such a legal matter, the question of the judge and ruler should be in explicit words and not in euphemisms.
It was stated in the Encyclopedia of Jurisprudence
The judge must inquire into the basic, general matters upon which the correct ruling depends, so that it is based on clear matters that are not ambiguous or vague.
As mentioned in the hadith of Ma’iz , when he confessed to adultery, the Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace , did not stone him until after he had asked him more details, saying: ” Perhaps you kissed, winked, or looked?” He said: “No, O Messenger of God .” He said: “You had intercourse with her, and do not use a euphemism .” Then he ordered that he be stoned. The Prophet, may God bless him and grant him peace , did not leave room for the possibility of exaggeration.
The door of metaphors is not for matters in which blood is shed and honour is exposed , but there is no room for general words in matters in which blood is permissible and lives are lost .
It must be explicit and cannot be implied.
Rather, all positive laws contain explicit statements in cases of rape and the like, and they do not suffice with salting it out. This is known even in forensic medicine, and these details are essential for the completion of an accurate ruling.
The Messenger is the judge and ruler who rules by the command of God . Therefore, the statement in this regard is the ultimate in justice and good manners to preserve people’s blood and to ( precisely ) examine the crime and its details and base the ruling on these details.
This is a rational and legal matter, without a doubt.
Even in matters of slander, the judge must ask ( explicitly ) the slanderer and the witness whether he saw the man insert his penis into the woman’s vagina ( explicitly ). He should not be satisfied with hinting, but if he were satisfied with hinting, then ( the ruling ) would be valid .
Because some may call (intercourse and sexual intercourse) merely the man having intercourse with the woman, so if he sees the man having intercourse with the woman, he calls it intercourse and sexual intercourse, and this does not establish the ruling of adultery, but rather its purpose is to punish by imprisonment and torture.
So this matter is not something to be ashamed of. Rather, it is a religious duty.
Because the issue is related to a legal ruling and the blood of ( the infallible ), the discussion is about the loss of his infallibility, which is a serious issue that requires careful examination of the expressions and the elimination of illusions and possibilities.
In the proverb, he said: Whoever fucks the donkey will fuck Nayaka. The people were overcome by drowsiness. And the eyelids closed on each other. Al-Azhari in the translation of Nakah: The rain fucked the ground and drowsiness fucked his eye. If the Messenger, may
God bless him and grant him peace , was in the position of the judge, and the judge must know everything before he issues a ruling, and this is well-known in the judiciary everywhere.
🚨
We also see from what Ma’iz said to the Messenger, may God bless him and grant him peace:
quote I don’t like it
First: The word is not disgusting, as it is restricted to the situation in which it was said
. Second: It is the word that indicates what happened, so his saying is not a euphemism, meaning that what happened cannot be euphemized with anything other than this word that indicates the event.