The Prophet and Usaid ibn Hudayr: What the Kissing Hadith Actually Says
Critics occasionally cite a hadith about a Companion kissing the Prophet ﷺ on his side, attempting to read sexual implication into it. This note presents the full context of the narration, its multiple chains, the precise linguistic meaning of the term critics mistranslate, the evidence of the Companions’ love for the Prophet ﷺ, and the New Testament parallels that apply the same standard of scrutiny to the Gospels.
The Companions’ Love for the Messenger ﷺ
Before examining the narration, it is necessary to understand the nature of the relationship between the Companions and the Prophet ﷺ. Their love for him was unlike anything recorded in history.
Urwah ibn Mas’ud al-Thaqafi came to the Prophet ﷺ at Hudaybiyyah as a negotiator on behalf of the Quraysh — before his own conversion to Islam. When he returned to them, he said:
And when Khubayb ibn Adi, may Allah be pleased with him, was crucified by the polytheists and they placed weapons against him, one of them said to him: Would you like Muhammad to be in your place?
A man captive and facing execution would not accept the safety of his Prophet ﷺ at the price of a single thorn. This is the depth of love within which the narration of Usaid ibn Hudayr must be read.
The Prophet ﷺ himself described by Allah as:
“And indeed, you are of a great moral character.”
And the Prophet ﷺ said of himself:
Collection: Referenced in books of seerah and hadith
He was the master of creation in joking, in kindness, and in sitting with his people — as much as he was the master of creation in raising, teaching, and striving. It is no wonder that the Companions responded to his openness with the expressions of love this narration records.
The Narration and Its Multiple Chains
Narrator: Abu Sa’id al-Khudri | Collection: Sunan Abi Dawud; Sunan al-Nasa’i
Narrator: Abu al-Nadr and others | Collection: Al-Bayhaqi, Al-Sunan al-Kubra | Note: Al-Dhahabi described a version of this chain as strong
Narrator: Abu Layla — Usaid ibn Hudayr | Chain: Described as strong by Al-Dhahabi
The full chain in Sunan Abi Dawud runs: Amr ibn Awn — Khalid — Husayn — Abd al-Rahman ibn Abi Layla — Usaid ibn Hudayr al-Ansari.
What the Narration Actually Describes
The narration records a playful exchange during a gathering. The Prophet ﷺ — as was his known practice — was joking with his Companions to bring them joy. He poked Usaid in the side with a stick or his finger. Usaid said he was hurt and the Prophet ﷺ, following his consistent practice, offered to allow him to take equal retaliation. Usaid said: you are wearing a shirt and I am not — meaning he could not strike the bare skin of the Prophet ﷺ equivalently. The Prophet ﷺ lifted his shirt to expose his side, making the retaliation possible. Usaid’s response was to embrace the Prophet ﷺ and kiss his side — an expression of love and a declaration that taking revenge on the Messenger of Allah ﷺ was unthinkable to him.
This is confirmed by his own words: “May my father and mother be sacrificed for you, O Messenger of Allah — so you wanted this.” He was saying: I understand now — you lifted your shirt so that I could embrace you, not so that I could strike you. He interpreted the gesture as an invitation to the very thing he did.
The context is established further by the Abu Sa’id narration and the Abu al-Nadr narration, which are parallel incidents of the same type. In each case: the Prophet ﷺ pokes or touches a Companion, offers him retaliation, the Companion refuses revenge and instead turns the moment into one of physical affection and love.
The Meaning of the Key Term
Critics claimed the word kashh (كشح) refers to the buttocks. This is a fabrication.
The term has no connection to the buttocks in any classical Arabic lexicon. The critical reading depends entirely on this fabricated mistranslation. Once the actual meaning is restored — the flank and side of the torso — the narration describes exactly what it says: a man kissing the side of the Prophet ﷺ out of love after being offered the chance to strike him there in retaliation.
The New Testament Parallel
Those who read sexual implication into a Companion kissing the Prophet’s ﷺ side out of love do not apply the same reading to the Gospels they accept.
The Gospel of John records a disciple leaning on Jesus’s bosom, lying on his breast, and reclining against his chest — repeatedly, in front of the other disciples, at the Last Supper. Saint Augustine identified this disciple as John the Evangelist, and noted that he was the disciple who enjoyed Christ’s love the most. Augustine also noted that Peter felt jealousy at the intimacy of this relationship. The same Gospel that records a disciple physically reclining on Jesus’s chest is used by critics to mock a Companion kissing the Prophet’s ﷺ side in a gesture of love.
The same critics who raise this objection accept without question that prophets in their own scriptures committed adultery, that one stripped naked while drunk, and that another warmed himself with a virgin before his death. They find nothing problematic in any of that. But a Companion kissing his Prophet ﷺ in a moment of love and refusing to take revenge from him — this they present as evidence of moral corruption. The double standard is the argument.