Does _Belief in Evolution_ Lead to Scientific Progress
Does “belief in evolution” lead to scientific progress?!!
🪫 Does “belief in evolution” lead to scientific progress?!
Since the publication of Darwin’s book “The Origin of Species” ,
evolutionists are still on a failed journey to prove evolution —
((their statement always indicates that they have reached the end of science)).
So what are the implications of that?!
Why would they need to search for a scientific reason then?!!
Just as they tried — and are still trying —
to search for any organ with an unknown function
to say that it is useless due to chance genetic drift
(the other driving force of evolution according to their assumption),
so what are the implications of that?!
Then they will say:
“This organ is useless, so don’t search for its function, because we have discovered that it has no function.”
🪫 But the more science advances, the more the functions of these organs — or genes that they claimed were junk — are proven.
And yet, they are still searching for genes to say that they have no function.
All this, despite the fact that their ignorance was exposed in 2012 after the ENCODE project ;
But did they stop after the ENCODE project?
❌ No, of course not.
Rather, they wanted to stop it and explain it from an evolutionary perspective,
As stated in a lecture by evolutionary biologist Dan Graur ,
who mentioned that the ENCODE project , which discovers the functions of genes they claim are junk, “should be killed.”
🪫 And even now, there are still some who say that they are junk.
🧠 Is it limited to organs or genes only?!
❌ No.
Rather, the matter developed to searching for fossils
to try to prove that they are transitional links.
What did you gain from these attempts?!
🪫 Nothing.
Rather, when they were cornered after the advancement of science,
they said: “The old Darwinism is no longer useful, we will invent a modern Darwinism.”
Are they satisfied with this?!
❌ No.
Rather, the matter evolved into: Survival of the fittest.
So, the human being who cannot survive…
that’s it… Leave him — what will you do with him?
🪫 Of course, you will think I am joking;
but this talk can never be objected to by any Darwinist,
except a Darwinist who does not understand evolution.
🧬 ★ And here is the most important question:
❓ Did evolution lead to the advancement of medical science?
Let me tell you — the 2024 Nobel Prize in Medicine was for the discovery of the function of microRNA ,
which evolutionists said was useless.
Let’s continue…
Renowned evolutionist Jerry Coyne admits in Nature :
🪫 “Evolution cannot help us predict what new vaccines to manufacture because microbes evolve unpredictably.”
But hasn’t evolution helped guide animal and plant breeding?
🪫 Not very much.
Most of the improvement in crops, plants, and animals occurred long before we knew anything about evolution,
and came from people following the genetic principle that “like begets like.”
Even now, as its practitioners admit,
the field of quantitative genetics has been of little value in helping improve varieties.
🪫
Future progress will almost certainly come through genetic modification,
which is not based on evolution at all.
📌 Most improvement in crop plants and animals occurred long before we knew anything about evolution,
and came about by people following the genetic principle of “like begets like.”
Even now, as its practitioners admit,
the field of quantitative genetics has been of little value in helping improve varieties.
🪫 Future advances will almost certainly come from transgenics —
which is not based on evolution at all.